Glückspilz! So wurde dieser Bitcoin (BTC)-Hobby-Miner ...

Always bet on RED

[link]

BitcoinZ: A community gift to the world.

BitcoinZ, a cryptocurrency based on bitcoin + zkSNARKs
[link]

Bminer is a highly optimized cryptocurrency miner that runs on modern NVIDIA GPUs

A subreddit, for people using Bminer for mining that want to share knowledge, configs, and advice to others.
[link]

Biggest BCH miner on Twitter: "It is just embarrassing to see the fall of bitcoin.com...they can not cover this story [32MB block] and not mention that all these 32MB blocks were on Bitcoin SV & that ABC & BU sucked. This story is misleading." Bitcoin.com is the new Bitcointalk.org

Biggest BCH miner on Twitter: submitted by madonnina to btc [link] [comments]

Biggest BCH miner on Twitter: "It is just embarrassing to see the fall of bitcoin.com...they can not cover this story [32MB block] and not mention that all these 32MB blocks were on Bitcoin SV & that ABC & BU sucked. This story is misleading." Bitcoin.com is the new Bitcointalk.org

Biggest BCH miner on Twitter: submitted by cryptoanalyticabot to cryptoall [link] [comments]

Biggest BCH miner on Twitter: "It is just embarrassing to see the fall of bitcoin.com...they can not cover this story [32MB block] and not mention that all these 32MB blocks were on Bitcoin SV & that ABC & BU sucked. This story is misleading." Bitcoin.com is the new Bitcointalk.org

Biggest BCH miner on Twitter: submitted by ABitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

"No coincidence that 2X got cancelled shortly after PoW change was being prepared. In future, the best way to bring miners to heel is to talk loudly about changing the PoW. They fear our power to fire them!"~Cøbra (Co-owner of http://bitcoin.org & http://bitcointalk.org .)

submitted by Windowly to btc [link] [comments]

"No coincidence that 2X got cancelled shortly after PoW change was being prepared. In future, the best way to bring miners to heel is to talk loudly about changing the PoW. They fear our power to fire them!"~Cbra (Co-owner of http://bitcoin.org & http://bitcointalk.org .)

submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

07-10 17:22 - 'Send value with No fee, No miners, (almost) instant tx and with the lightest blockchain ever. Join Democracy BCO now.' (bitcointalk.org) by /u/kaselit removed from /r/Bitcoin within 7-12min

Send value with No fee, No miners, (almost) instant tx and with the lightest blockchain ever. Join Democracy BCO now.
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: kaselit
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

Every bitcoin has blood on it, miners blood. End the cycle. /bitcointalk.org

submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

the Crazy Bitcoin , the Crazy Chinese Miner! /bitcointalk.org

submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Time to buy in

Lets start off by saying I have called a lot of the dips back in 2016-2020 just check my posts on here and bitcointalk. I know this might dip, and hell we might even see 10,500-11K again. There is just too many forces at work for this not to go a lot higher though.
#1 is you have Greyscale and other companies picking up huge amounts of bitcoin almost double even what the miners are able to produce per block. Simply put the supply is dwindling and the upward pressure will be too strong at some point. The miners tend to sell some of their rewards, but they are not selling all.
#2 The dollar is in a really bad situation here. If people are noticing the main correlation of where bitcoin price goes it lies in the strength/weakness of the dollar. With 28 trillion in debt I am not sure how we make it out of this hole. I don't think you will see it completely collapse, however the printing presses are really going full tilt which inflation is under control right now, but for how long ? One of the major currencies Dollar, Yen, Euro, or Yuan will come close to collapsing in the next few years. Fiat can only go for so long before it needs a hard re-set.
#3 Mining rewards were halved. I know this was months ago, but not having double the bitcoin being dumped is a huge advantage. The bitcoin is in strong hands / hodlers.
#3 the Defi game has changed the landscape. More and more people are going to jump on the Defi bandwagon and get their bitcoins wrapped or use Blockfi, Aave ect. In the short term these can be used to short bitcoin, but it's already creating a wave of buying so people can get the yield. This has more advantages on upward price movements as it will control the tempo. On the other side of this however is in a year or two one of these will blow up taking everyone's btc with them so be careful.
#4 On August 1st we had a sell off where they pushed the bid down from 12k to 10,500 in 15 minutes on massive sell orders and some stop loss selling. Each tumble like that is getting more and more expensive. These pushes are to scoop up the derivatives they buy before the major sell offs . This has been a ongoing trend in bitcoin from even the early years (not the derivatives side). As time goes on and there are less and less coins these are getting way more expensive to manipulate it on the short side. That's why they did the dump in such a short time frame, because the longer the dump is going to cost even more money.
Overall I can really see this taking off again soon after the consolidation. I also believe we take out the ATH here in a few months.
submitted by ridenourt to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Since they're calling for r/btc to be banned...

Maybe it's time to discuss bitcoin's history again. Credit to u/singularity87 for the original post over 3 years ago.

People should get the full story of bitcoin because it is probably one of the strangest of all reddit subs.
bitcoin, the main sub for the bitcoin community is held and run by a person who goes by the pseudonym u/theymos. Theymos not only controls bitcoin, but also bitcoin.org and bitcointalk.com. These are top three communication channels for the bitcoin community, all controlled by just one person.
For most of bitcoin's history this did not create a problem (at least not an obvious one anyway) until around mid 2015. This happened to be around the time a new player appeared on the scene, a for-profit company called Blockstream. Blockstream was made up of/hired many (but not all) of the main bitcoin developers. (To be clear, Blockstream was founded before mid 2015 but did not become publicly active until then). A lot of people, including myself, tried to point out there we're some very serious potential conflicts of interest that could arise when one single company controls most of the main developers for the biggest decentralised and distributed cryptocurrency. There were a lot of unknowns but people seemed to give them the benefit of the doubt because they were apparently about to release some new software called "sidechains" that could offer some benefits to the network.
Not long after Blockstream came on the scene the issue of bitcoin's scalability once again came to forefront of the community. This issue came within the community a number of times since bitcoins inception. Bitcoin, as dictated in the code, cannot handle any more than around 3 transactions per second at the moment. To put that in perspective Paypal handles around 15 transactions per second on average and VISA handles something like 2000 transactions per second. The discussion in the community has been around how best to allow bitcoin to scale to allow a higher number of transactions in a given amount of time. I suggest that if anyone is interested in learning more about this problem from a technical angle, they go to btc and do a search. It's a complex issue but for many who have followed bitcoin for many years, the possible solutions seem relatively obvious. Essentially, currently the limit is put in place in just a few lines of code. This was not originally present when bitcoin was first released. It was in fact put in place afterwards as a measure to stop a bloating attack on the network. Because all bitcoin transactions have to be stored forever on the bitcoin network, someone could theoretically simply transmit a large number of transactions which would have to be stored by the entire network forever. When bitcoin was released, transactions were actually for free as the only people running the network were enthusiasts. In fact a single bitcoin did not even have any specific value so it would be impossible set a fee value. This meant that a malicious person could make the size of the bitcoin ledger grow very rapidly without much/any cost which would stop people from wanting to join the network due to the resource requirements needed to store it, which at the time would have been for very little gain.
Towards the end of the summer last year, this bitcoin scaling debate surfaced again as it was becoming clear that the transaction limit for bitcoin was semi regularly being reached and that it would not be long until it would be regularly hit and the network would become congested. This was a very serious issue for a currency. Bitcoin had made progress over the years to the point of retailers starting to offer it as a payment option. Bitcoin companies like, Microsoft, Paypal, Steam and many more had began to adopt it. If the transaction limit would be constantly maxed out, the network would become unreliable and slow for users. Users and businesses would not be able to make a reliable estimate when their transaction would be confirmed by the network.
Users, developers and businesses (which at the time was pretty much the only real bitcoin subreddit) started to discuss how we should solve the problem bitcoin. There was significant support from the users and businesses behind a simple solution put forward by the developer Gavin Andreesen. Gavin was the lead developer after Satoshi Nakamoto left bitcoin and he left it in his hands. Gavin initially proposed a very simple solution of increasing the limit which was to change the few lines of code to increase the maximum number of transactions that are allowed. For most of bitcoin's history the transaction limit had been set far far higher than the number of transactions that could potentially happen on the network. The concept of increasing the limit one time was based on the fact that history had proven that no issue had been cause by this in the past.
A certain group of bitcoin developers decided that increasing the limit by this amount was too much and that it was dangerous. They said that the increased use of resources that the network would use would create centralisation pressures which could destroy the network. The theory was that a miner of the network with more resources could publish many more transactions than a competing small miner could handle and therefore the network would tend towards few large miners rather than many small miners. The group of developers who supported this theory were all developers who worked for the company Blockstream. The argument from people in support of increasing the transaction capacity by this amount was that there are always inherent centralisation pressure with bitcoin mining. For example miners who can access the cheapest electricity will tend to succeed and that bigger miners will be able to find this cheaper electricity easier. Miners who have access to the most efficient computer chips will tend to succeed and that larger miners are more likely to be able to afford the development of them. The argument from Gavin and other who supported increasing the transaction capacity by this method are essentially there are economies of scale in mining and that these economies have far bigger centralisation pressures than increased resource cost for a larger number of transactions (up to the new limit proposed). For example, at the time the total size of the blockchain was around 50GB. Even for the cost of a 500GB SSD is only $150 and would last a number of years. This is in-comparison to the $100,000's in revenue per day a miner would be making.
Various developers put forth various other proposals, including Gavin Andresen who put forth a more conservative increase that would then continue to increase over time inline with technological improvements. Some of the employees of blockstream also put forth some proposals, but all were so conservative, it would take bitcoin many decades before it could reach a scale of VISA. Even though there was significant support from the community behind Gavin's simple proposal of increasing the limit it was becoming clear certain members of the bitcoin community who were part of Blockstream were starting to become increasingly vitriolic and divisive. Gavin then teamed up with one of the other main bitcoin developers Mike Hearn and released a coded (i.e. working) version of the bitcoin software that would only activate if it was supported by a significant majority of the network. What happened next was where things really started to get weird.
After this free and open source software was released, Theymos, the person who controls all the main communication channels for the bitcoin community implemented a new moderation policy that disallowed any discussion of this new software. Specifically, if people were to discuss this software, their comments would be deleted and ultimately they would be banned temporarily or permanently. This caused chaos within the community as there was very clear support for this software at the time and it seemed our best hope for finally solving the problem and moving on. Instead a censorship campaign was started. At first it 'all' they were doing was banning and removing discussions but after a while it turned into actively manipulating the discussion. For example, if a thread was created where there was positive sentiment for increasing the transaction capacity or being negative about the moderation policies or negative about the actions of certain bitcoin developers, the mods of bitcoin would selectively change the sorting order of threads to 'controversial' so that the most support opinions would be sorted to the bottom of the thread and the most vitriolic would be sorted to the top of the thread. This was initially very transparent as it was possible to see that the most downvoted comments were at the top and some of the most upvoted were at the bottom. So they then implemented hiding the voting scores next to the users name. This made impossible to work out the sentiment of the community and when combined with selectively setting the sorting order to controversial it was possible control what information users were seeing. Also, due to the very very large number of removed comments and users it was becoming obvious the scale of censorship going on. To hide this they implemented code in their CSS for the sub that completely hid comments that they had removed so that the censorship itself was hidden. Anyone in support of scaling bitcoin were removed from the main communication channels. Theymos even proudly announced that he didn't care if he had to remove 90% of the users. He also later acknowledged that he knew he had the ability to block support of this software using the control he had over the communication channels.
While this was all going on, Blockstream and it's employees started lobbying the community by paying for conferences about scaling bitcoin, but with the very very strange rule that no decisions could be made and no complete solutions could be proposed. These conferences were likely strategically (and successfully) created to stunt support for the scaling software Gavin and Mike had released by forcing the community to take a "lets wait and see what comes from the conferences" kind of approach. Since no final solutions were allowed at these conferences, they only served to hinder and splinter the communities efforts to find a solution. As the software Gavin and Mike released called BitcoinXT gained support it started to be attacked. Users of the software were attack by DDOS. Employees of Blockstream were recommending attacks against the software, such as faking support for it, to only then drop support at the last moment to put the network in disarray. Blockstream employees were also publicly talking about suing Gavin and Mike from various different angles simply for releasing this open source software that no one was forced to run. In the end Mike Hearn decided to leave due to the way many members of the bitcoin community had treated him. This was due to the massive disinformation campaign against him on bitcoin. One of the many tactics that are used against anyone who does not support Blockstream and the bitcoin developers who work for them is that you will be targeted in a smear campaign. This has happened to a number of individuals and companies who showed support for scaling bitcoin. Theymos has threatened companies that he will ban any discussion of them on the communication channels he controls (i.e. all the main ones) for simply running software that he disagrees with (i.e. any software that scales bitcoin).
As time passed, more and more proposals were offered, all against the backdrop of ever increasing censorship in the main bitcoin communication channels. It finally come down the smallest and most conservative solution. This solution was much smaller than even the employees of Blockstream had proposed months earlier. As usual there was enormous attacks from all sides and the most vocal opponents were the employees of Blockstream. These attacks still are ongoing today. As this software started to gain support, Blockstream organised more meetings, especially with the biggest bitcoin miners and made a pact with them. They promised that they would release code that would offer an on-chain scaling solution hardfork within about 4 months, but if the miners wanted this they would have to commit to running their software and only their software. The miners agreed and the ended up not running the most conservative proposal possible. This was in February last year. There is no hardfork proposal in sight from the people who agreed to this pact and bitcoin is still stuck with the exact same transaction limit it has had since the limit was put in place about 6 years ago. Gavin has also been publicly smeared by the developers at Blockstream and a plot was made against him to have him removed from the development team. Gavin has now been, for all intents an purposes, expelled from bitcoin development. This has meant that all control of bitcoin development is in the hands of the developers working at Blockstream.
There is a new proposal that offers a market based approach to scaling bitcoin. This essentially lets the market decide. Of course, as usual there has been attacks against it, and verbal attacks from the employees of Blockstream. This has the biggest chance of gaining wide support and solving the problem for good.
To give you an idea of Blockstream; It has hired most of the main and active bitcoin developers and is now synonymous with the "Core" bitcoin development team. They AFAIK no products at all. They have received around $75m in funding. Every single thing they do is supported by theymos. They have started implementing an entirely new economic system for bitcoin against the will of it's users and have blocked any and all attempts to scaling the network in line with the original vision.
Although this comment is ridiculously long, it really only covers the tip of the iceberg. You could write a book on the last two years of bitcoin. The things that have been going on have been mind blowing. One last thing that I think is worth talking about is the u/bashco's claim of vote manipulation.
The users that the video talks about have very very large numbers of downvotes mostly due to them having a very very high chance of being astroturfers. Around about the same time last year when Blockstream came active on the scene every single bitcoin troll disappeared, and I mean literally every single one. In the years before that there were a large number of active anti-bitcoin trolls. They even have an active sub buttcoin. Up until last year you could go down to the bottom of pretty much any thread in bitcoin and see many of the usual trolls who were heavily downvoted for saying something along the lines of "bitcoin is shit", "You guys and your tulips" etc. But suddenly last year they all disappeared. Instead a new type of bitcoin user appeared. Someone who said they were fully in support of bitcoin but they just so happened to support every single thing Blockstream and its employees said and did. They had the exact same tone as the trolls who had disappeared. Their way to talking to people was aggressive, they'd call people names, they had a relatively poor understanding of how bitcoin fundamentally worked. They were extremely argumentative. These users are the majority of the list of that video. When the 10's of thousands of users were censored and expelled from bitcoin they ended up congregating in btc. The strange thing was that the users listed in that video also moved over to btc and spend all day everyday posting troll-like comments and misinformation. Naturally they get heavily downvoted by the real users in btc. They spend their time constantly causing as much drama as possible. At every opportunity they scream about "censorship" in btc while they are happy about the censorship in bitcoin. These people are astroturfers. What someone somewhere worked out, is that all you have to do to take down a community is say that you are on their side. It is an astoundingly effective form of psychological attack.
submitted by CuriousTitmouse to btc [link] [comments]

Amaury History Summary

https://www.change.org/p/bitcoin-cash-community-bitcoin-abc-must-step-down-from-control-of-bitcoin-cash[change.org](https://www.change.org/p/bitcoin-cash-community-bitcoin-abc-must-step-down-from-control-of-bitcoin-cash)
Introduction
Bitcoin Cash lived because of Amaury taking control against the community and being able to push through the brainwashed community of Bitcoin, especially BitcoinTalk and Bitcoin back in 2017. But today, where BCH has split into BCH and BSV, his actions are attempting to destroy BCH himself by doing things not wanted by the remaining community that supports the BCH goal in general.
Last March, he pushed forward for the Infrastructure Funding Plan, a way to pay the developers from a small portion of the blocks mined by the miners. However, it's implementation was not a very good one, due to its inherent limitations by only making Bitcoin ABC, which was the main mining node, dictate which wallet address does the "IFP" coins go to, and therefore Bitcoin Cash Node (BCHN) was created without it as Bitcoin ABC still has the IFP in their code.
Last few weeks ago, Johnathan Toomin proposed the ASERT DAA for a replacement DAA or difficulty adjustment algorithm. However, because Toomin created it on BCHN and not ABC, it was not taken by Bitcoin ABC and Amaury created Grasberg DAA in response. This DAA was hastily made and was immediately put into the Bitcoin ABC. The code is currently being under review and a lot of it is being heavily rewritten back conform with Toomin's ASERT, which had been a better proposal in itself. Take note that Grasberg did not start as a proposal.
In smaller related news, Shammah Chancellor created a meme competition about Bitcoin Cash's current community. The people liked it and most of Read.Cash joined it, however, it broke an essential rule from the media platform, due to the main goal for the memes containing controversial name-calling insults for Amaury and status in the Bitcoin Cash community. While the competition is in good graces, what we all don't know is that memes will only encourage those of ill intent to continue them, knowing that it will merely rile up those who do not want the struggle and the FUD and they will attack others in a deeper level. It had a side-effect of the Read.Cash developer banning himself from it.
Some people take memes seriously, and they do not care if you say they are satire or not.
This brings us to my point. We need a change of direction, and it starts with the hero who had turned into a villain and the community he has with it.
Amaury Séchet should stop controlling the Bitcoin Cash protocol and allow others to implement their proposals. If you can't do it, get someone else.
Shammah Chancellor should stop being a hypocrite and saying this (and this!) while going out to proclaim that Read.Cash is censored. Go do your own thing if you don't want it.
C. Edward Kelso should stop making anyone who is against Shammah nor Amaury or any of the Bitcoin ABC members look bad. Write the truth if needed. Heavily imply it, if you can't stop doing it your badly-described articles.
Bitcoin Cash should not be led by these people if all they do not bend down and take the community at their backs. We already have great progress and these setbacks will cost us the whole Bitcoin promise. We are already under attack. Do not let them destroy it.
submitted by steve_m0 to btc [link] [comments]

Matic Network Guide 2020 - Where to Buy, Wallets, Price Prediction

Matic Network Guide 2020 - Where to Buy, Wallets, Price Prediction submitted by moneshkumar02 to maticnetwork [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Token (BTCT) is a golden nugget

Have you heard about 'money remittance' concept? I'm sure you have used or at least heard someone talking about using WesternUnion or even USPS to send money to their loved ones across boundaries, typically from one country to another (i.e., from US to Mexico).
Sending 'money' to someone is not different than sending 'value' --that's worth something elsewhere-- or giving away some asset to a different person so he/she can use it towards any end. This core concept was looked-into by Satoshi Nakamoto (who invented Bitcoin) in its first whitepaper. Nevertheless, Bitcoin has its own setbacks regarding power-cost efficiency and transaction confirmation times, although it solves the 'double-spending' dilemma, it results in a pretty inefficient means to send small (<100 USD) amounts of money.

Other thing to take into consideration when evaluating a remittance platform is the regulation sandbox on both ends of the transaction. If the sender is in an over-regulated country, as is the recipient, then it could be costly and even unlawful, resulting on market inefficiencies that makes cryptocurrency remittances highly risky.

Bitcoin Token (BTCT) is a PIVX fork who, itself, is a DASH fork who, itself, is a BTC fork. That makes BTCT a 4th. BTC generation crypto asset, classified as a payment coin with its own blockchain. BTCT confirms transactions in less than 3 seconds. BTCT uses 1/1000 of the power used by a BTC miner to create new coins and it has the same total supply as BTC, that is: 21 million coins. And BTCT is also a PoS protocol crypto asset, making it available to mine either by old computers as newly produced high-end ones, like any i7 or AMD Ryzen based motherboards.

Bitcoin Token (BTCT) is also a true decentralised project, like BTC; there's no CEO nor CTO nor CFO, making it a community-driven cryptocurrency.
Bitcoin Token (BTCT) was launched on 21st. November, 2019. It has a market capitalization of about 300K USD and its current price is ranging between 50 and 150 satoshis. Their community is 50K+ wide abroad Twitter, Telegram, Facebook, Instagram, Discord and Bitcointalk. The cost of one masternode (staking miner) is about $70 USD, which has an implicit collateral of 10K BTCT coins. They're listed on 6+ exchanges, CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko and have a really awesome dev team.

There's been a lot of chatter about this project being able to deliver BTCT direct spending on 'real-fiat' world via a debit card, and that's because of their partnership with ZCore. If they manage to do that, I'm sure it will surely be a nice valuable alternative to remittance coins like XRP, and it would likely pose a very interesting investment option for 'low-marketcap' cryptos.

Their official website is: https://www.bitcointoken.pw/
submitted by iceBlockWare to CryptoMoonShots [link] [comments]

DRK Cross Chain DEX

INTRODUCTION
Decentralized Finance known as DeFi has emerged as a game-changing concept and sector in the Crypto space which has captured lots of Global investor's attention and helps in the mission of Crypto global adoption. New blockchain startups and existing blockchain platforms have been integrating DeFi into their various ecosystem so as to improve their operational standard and offering the global users more versatile and efficient blockchain services. There still exist some crypto users who believe investing in Bitcoin is the height of investment in the Crypto space. The majority of them have not heard about DeFi nor explore the potential of the technology. For those classes of people, I will briefly explain what Decentralized Finance known as DeFi is all about.
https://preview.redd.it/m0ospzuchxs51.jpg?width=679&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=815df27601b059f064a167ee58ba50a724a01938
ABOUT DRK DRK рlаtfоrm іѕ ѕіmрlу аn іnnоvаtіvе blосkсhаіn рlаtfоrm ѕреаr hеаdіng the mіѕѕіоn of Suѕtаіnаblе Global Dесеntrаlіzеd Fіnаnсіаl Sуѕtеm .Thе Draken Grоuр Dіgіtаl Bаnkіng ѕуѕtеm іѕ thе раrеnt соmраnу thаt bоrn DRK dесеntrаlіzеd рlаtfоrm .Rеаdіlу , Draken Grоuр hаѕ bееn іn ореrаtіоn fоr a while ѕресіаlіzіng іn Dіgіtаl Banking system . Draken Grоuрѕ leverages thе benefit оf blockchain technology іntо thе fіnаnсіаl ѕуѕtеm tо bооѕt thе efficacy оf thеіr fіnаnсіаl services. Thіѕ wіll enable customers tо enjoy сhеареr, еffісіеnt, faster аnd mоrе trаnѕраrеnt fіnаnсіаl ѕеrvісеѕ. Drаkеn оffеrѕ all іn оnе decentralized investment рlаtfоrm whісh еnаblе еnаblе аnу uѕеrѕ to еаrn , ѕtоrе , іnvеѕt and trаdе uѕіng blосkсhаіn and DApps іn a trust-less manner without thе іnvоlvеmеnt of any brоkеr оr intermediary. Drаkеn рlаtfоrm іѕ 100% dесеntrаlіzеd ,sees ѕесurіtу аnd ѕаfеtу оf іnvеѕtоrѕ and trаdеrѕ fundѕ as рrіоrіtу. DRK focuses оn оffеrіng the bеѕt fіnаnсіаl services for the global uѕеrѕ , hence іnсоrораtіng lаtеѕt Decentralized technologies in thе DеFі space ѕо аѕ tо оffеr the global uѕеrѕ all in оnе Plаtfоrm where everyone all оvеr thе world can access thеіr vаrіоuѕ Decentralized fіnаnсіаl Products аnd services. Draken Specification | Draken Innovations | Security
● ANONYMOUS-ON-DEMAND: Enter and leave the DaRK mode at whatever point you feel like. ● SUSTAINABLE (Anti-spam, against slack): Miners have financial and notoriety in question to stay legitimate and safeguard the life span of the organization. ● PROOF-OF-STAKE: Fast, modest, adaptable, vitality productive, ecologically inviting, majority rule. ● PORTABLE: Allow designers to port their shrewd agreements to other decentralized innovations. ● CHEAP: Cheaper than current decentralized option with significantly less gas devoured. Shrewd agreements are enhanced for gas use, adjusted between against spamming and monetary possibility. ● FAST: Can have a blocktime on the request for 5 seconds and handle up to a great many exchanges every second. ● FINALITY: Each square fixed is irreversible - no previous deed can be fixed. ● SCALABLE: Fast conclusiveness coordinates the throughput prerequisites of your developing client base. ● SECURE: Access control firewalls your applications against vindictive modules.
Token Information : DrakenX Token Token name: DrakenX Symbol: DRX Total supply: 100,000,000,000 (a hundred billion) Contract: https://explorer.draken.tech/tokens/0x0091781D02dA4a883fA6a47A6d3C007CbFcF1107/token_transfers
WEBSITE: https://draken.tech/
WHITEPAPER: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mHtV50CktdFCyD_NaH370sZ8sOBehgce/view
TELEGRAM : https://https//t.me/Drakentech
FACEBOOK : https://www.facebook.com/DRKDEX
TWITER: https://twitter.com/DRKDeFi
DRAKEN DEX: https://draken.exchange/
DRAKEN ENTERTAINMENT: https://www.drakenx.io/play
STAKING PLATFORM : https://staking.draken.tech/
DRAKEN BLOCKCHAIN : https://explorer.draken.tech

AUTHOR : Bitcointalk Username: Amendy1 Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2426201 Trx Wallet Address: TE1UjS3Q5aEmmeC5j8keumnEFLUops3X5H DRK wallet address: 0xDbb0378a038E2909d927e8Bf70b7CA8A9bE32eBd
submitted by Ammybae to altcoin_critique [link] [comments]

0xMonero, summary of findings

Edit: There was prior work by Artemiscult I didn't know about from a month ago!
Hi, this is a summary of my findings on 0xMonero, which claims to be "a mineable privacy focused project".
The contract was deployed on April 18th of this year, verified on Etherscan the same day, announced on Twitter soon after. It was announced on Bitcoin Talk about ten days later. 0xMonero's contract is an uncredited rip of 0xBitcoin's with only very small changes. The mining software recommended by 0xMonero was written for 0xBitcoin. There are two other more modern miners written for 0xBitcoin, but up until recently, they have only supported pool mining, not solo. My suspicion for why 0xMonero recommends the older miner is that they don't have anyone competent to run a mining pool.
Here's 0xMonero's stats page, and here's 0xBitcoin's. Look familiar? 0x1d00ffff wrote that page for 0xBitcoin about a month after the 0xBitcoin project started in February 2018. Here's the initial commit, and here are the changes 0xMonero made. When 0xMonero ripped it, at least they left the author's Etherscan link at the bottom.
Here's 0xMonero's official GitHub. As of now, there are 20 repos, but they are all forks, zero original repos. I've been told that 0xMonero has ten developers. When I asked to see their GitHub accounts, I was told that they were all too concerned with privacy. That doesn't make sense to me, since I've been doing anonymous development under various identities for years. Here's the account associated with my work for 0xBitcoin, and here's another project I work on with other anonymous developers.
Why does 0xMonero make reference to Monero? I don't know. As far as I can tell, 0xMonero has nothing to do with Monero. I can say with certainty that since 0xMonero's contract is an almost identical copy of 0xBitcoin's, and 0xBitcoin deliberately did not include privacy features, there are no privacy features in the 0xMonero contract. They would have to be elsewhere. But as far as I know, there is no other code to look at.
Here's a piece-by-piece analysis of the claims on 0xMonero's site:
Here's a thread started by DigitalInvestments2 who claims to be a top holder of 0xMonero. In that thread, I asked many direct questions, and was not able to receive any clarification or substantiation of any aspect of what 0xMonero says they are working on.
When I couldn't get answers in that thread, I reached out twice to the official 0xMonero Twitter account asking them to start a thread where it would be possible to get answers. I got blocked. At the same time, I was blocked by another related Twitter account. Here's that account lying about 0xMonero's (nonexistent) privacy features.
I started talking about this stuff on 0xMonero's Bitcoin Talk thread about a week ago. I have been unable to get any answers there, either. But someone in that thread reported me. For what, I don't know.
I think that's it for what I know about 0xMonero at the moment. Please let me know what you think. Thanks.
Edit: Here's that related Twitter account lying about 0xMonero's nonexistent privacy features again.
Edit: lying about 0xMonero's nonexistent privacy features again, and AGAIN. Suggesting to people that 0xMonero is somehow private is dangerous.
Edit: ... lying about privacy again.
Edit: agreement about 0xMonero most likely being a complete scam from a second source: https://twitter.com/CryptoScamCases/status/1292753105097031680
Edit: lying about privacy again. Noticing a trend with 0xMonero and lying?
submitted by 0xBrian to CryptoMoonShots [link] [comments]

[ANN][ANDROID MINING][AIRDROP] NewEnglandcoin: Scrypt RandomSpike

New England
New England 6 States Songs: https://www.reddit.com/newengland/comments/er8wxd/new_england_6_states_songs/
NewEnglandcoin
Symbol: NENG
NewEnglandcoin is a clone of Bitcoin using scrypt as a proof-of-work algorithm with enhanced features to protect against 51% attack and decentralize on mining to allow diversified mining rigs across CPUs, GPUs, ASICs and Android phones.
Mining Algorithm: Scrypt with RandomSpike. RandomSpike is 3rd generation of Dynamic Difficulty (DynDiff) algorithm on top of scrypt.
1 minute block targets base difficulty reset: every 1440 blocks subsidy halves in 2.1m blocks (~ 2 to 4 years) 84,000,000,000 total maximum NENG 20000 NENG per block Pre-mine: 1% - reserved for dev fund ICO: None RPCPort: 6376 Port: 6377
NewEnglandcoin has dogecoin like supply at 84 billion maximum NENG. This huge supply insures that NENG is suitable for retail transactions and daily use. The inflation schedule of NengEnglandcoin is actually identical to that of Litecoin. Bitcoin and Litecoin are already proven to be great long term store of value. The Litecoin-like NENG inflation schedule will make NewEnglandcoin ideal for long term investment appreciation as the supply is limited and capped at a fixed number
Bitcoin Fork - Suitable for Home Hobbyists
NewEnglandcoin core wallet continues to maintain version tag of "Satoshi v0.8.7.5" because NewEnglandcoin is very much an exact clone of bitcoin plus some mining feature changes with DynDiff algorithm. NewEnglandcoin is very suitable as lite version of bitcoin for educational purpose on desktop mining, full node running and bitcoin programming using bitcoin-json APIs.
The NewEnglandcoin (NENG) mining algorithm original upgrade ideas were mainly designed for decentralization of mining rigs on scrypt, which is same algo as litecoin/dogecoin. The way it is going now is that NENG is very suitable for bitcoin/litecoin/dogecoin hobbyists who can not , will not spend huge money to run noisy ASIC/GPU mining equipments, but still want to mine NENG at home with quiet simple CPU/GPU or with a cheap ASIC like FutureBit Moonlander 2 USB or Apollo pod on solo mining setup to obtain very decent profitable results. NENG allows bitcoin litecoin hobbyists to experience full node running, solo mining, CPU/GPU/ASIC for a fun experience at home at cheap cost without breaking bank on equipment or electricity.
MIT Free Course - 23 lectures about Bitcoin, Blockchain and Finance (Fall,2018)
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUl4u3cNGP63UUkfL0onkxF6MYgVa04Fn
CPU Minable Coin Because of dynamic difficulty algorithm on top of scrypt, NewEnglandcoin is CPU Minable. Users can easily set up full node for mining at Home PC or Mac using our dedicated cheetah software.
Research on the first forked 50 blocks on v1.2.0 core confirmed that ASIC/GPU miners mined 66% of 50 blocks, CPU miners mined the remaining 34%.
NENG v1.4.0 release enabled CPU mining inside android phones.
Youtube Video Tutorial
How to CPU Mine NewEnglandcoin (NENG) in Windows 10 Part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdOoPvAjzlE How to CPU Mine NewEnglandcoin (NENG) in Windows 10 Part 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHnRJvJRzZg
How to CPU Mine NewEnglandcoin (NENG) in macOS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zj7NLMeNSOQ
Decentralization and Community Driven NewEnglandcoin is a decentralized coin just like bitcoin. There is no boss on NewEnglandcoin. Nobody nor the dev owns NENG.
We know a coin is worth nothing if there is no backing from community. Therefore, we as dev do not intend to make decision on this coin solely by ourselves. It is our expectation that NewEnglandcoin community will make majority of decisions on direction of this coin from now on. We as dev merely view our-self as coin creater and technical support of this coin while providing NENG a permanent home at ShorelineCrypto Exchange.
Twitter Airdrop
Follow NENG twitter and receive 100,000 NENG on Twitter Airdrop to up to 1000 winners
Graphic Redesign Bounty
Top one award: 90.9 million NENG Top 10 Winners: 500,000 NENG / person Event Timing: March 25, 2019 - Present Event Address: NewEnglandcoin DISCORD at: https://discord.gg/UPeBwgs
Please complete above Twitter Bounty requirement first. Then follow Below Steps to qualify for the Bounty: (1) Required: submit your own designed NENG logo picture in gif, png jpg or any other common graphic file format into DISCORD "bounty-submission" board (2) Optional: submit a second graphic for logo or any other marketing purposes into "bounty-submission" board. (3) Complete below form.
Please limit your submission to no more than two total. Delete any wrongly submitted or undesired graphics in the board. Contact DISCORD u/honglu69#5911 or u/krypton#6139 if you have any issues.
Twitter Airdrop/Graphic Redesign bounty sign up: https://goo.gl/forms/L0vcwmVi8c76cR7m1
Milestones
Roadmap
NENG v1.4.0 Android Mining, randomSpike Evaluation https://github.com/ShorelineCrypto/NewEnglandCoin/releases/download/NENG_2020_Q3_report/NENG_2020_Q3_report.pdf
RandomSpike - NENG core v1.3.0 Hardfork Upgrade Proposal https://github.com/ShorelineCrypto/NewEnglandCoin/releases/download/2020Q1_Report/Scrypt_RandomSpike_NENGv1.3.0_Hardfork_Proposal.pdf
NENG Security, Decentralization & Valuation
https://github.com/ShorelineCrypto/NewEnglandCoin/releases/download/2019Q2_report/NENG_Security_Decentralization_Value.pdf
Whitepaper v1.0 https://github.com/ShorelineCrypto/NewEnglandCoin/releases/download/whitepaper_v1.0/NENG_WhitePaper.pdf
DISCORD https://discord.gg/UPeBwgs
Explorer
http://www.findblocks.com/exploreNENG http://86.100.49.209/exploreNENG http://nengexplorer.mooo.com:3001/
Step by step guide on how to setup an explorer: https://github.com/ShorelineCrypto/nengexplorer
Github https://github.com/ShorelineCrypto/NewEnglandCoin
Wallet
Android with UserLand App (arm64/armhf), Chromebook (x64/arm64/armhf): https://github.com/ShorelineCrypto/NewEnglandCoin/releases/tag/v1.4.0.5
Linux Wallet (Ubuntu/Linux Mint, Debian/MX Linux, Arch/Manjaro, Fedora, openSUSE): https://github.com/ShorelineCrypto/NewEnglandCoin/releases/tag/v1.4.0.3
MacOS Wallet (10.11 El Capitan or higher): https://github.com/ShorelineCrypto/NewEnglandCoin/releases/tag/v1.4.0.2
Android with GNUroot on 32 bits old Phones (alpha release) wallet: https://github.com/ShorelineCrypto/NewEnglandCoin/releases/tag/v1.4.0
Windows wallet: https://github.com/ShorelineCrypto/NewEnglandCoin/releases/tag/v1.3.0.1
addnode ip address for the wallet to sync faster, frequently updated conf file: https://github.com/ShorelineCrypto/cheetah_cpumineblob/mastenewenglandcoin.conf-example
How to Sync Full Node Desktop Wallet https://www.reddit.com/NewEnglandCoin/comments/er6f0q/how_to_sync_full_node_desktop_wallet/
TWITTER https://twitter.com/newenglandcoin
REDDIT https://www.reddit.com/NewEnglandCoin/
Cheetah CPU Miner Software https://github.com/ShorelineCrypto/cheetah_cpuminer
Solo Mining with GPU or ASIC https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg52187727#msg52187727
How to Run Two Full Node in Same Desktop PC https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg53581449#msg53581449
ASIC/GPU Mining Pools Warning to Big ASIC Miners Due to DynDiff Algo on top of Scrypt, solo mining is recommended for ASIC/GPU miners. Further more, even for mining pools, small mining pool will generate better performance than big NENG mining pool because of new algo v1.2.x post hard fork.
The set up configuration of NENG for scrypt pool mining is same as a typical normal scrypt coin. In other word, DynDiff on Scrypt algo is backward compatible with Scrypt algo. Because ASIC/GPU miners rely on CPU miners for smooth blockchain movement, checkout bottom of "Latest News" section for A WARNING to All ASIC miners before you decide to dump big ASIC hash rate into NENG mining.
(1) Original DynDiff Warning: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg48324708#msg48324708 (2) New Warning on RandomSpike Spike difficulty (244k) introduced in RandomSpike served as roadblocks to instant mining and provide security against 51% attack risk. However, this spike difficulty like a roadblock that makes big ASIC mining less profitable. In case of spike block to be mined, the spike difficulty immediately serve as base difficulty, which will block GPU/ASIC miners effectively and leave CPU cheetah solo miners dominating mining almost 100% until next base difficulty reset.
FindBlocks http://findblocks.com/
CRpool http://crpool.xyz/
Cminors' Pool http://newenglandcoin.cminors-pool.com/
SPOOL https://spools.online/
Exchange
📷
https://shorelinecrypto.com/
Features: anonymous sign up and trading. No restriction or limit on deposit or withdraw.
The trading pairs available: NewEnglandcoin (NENG) / Dogecoin (DOGE)
Trading commission: A round trip trading will incur 0.10% trading fees in average. Fees are paid only on buyer side. buy fee: 0.2% / sell fee: 0% Deposit fees: free for all coins Withdraw fees: ZERO per withdraw. Mining fees are appointed by each coin blockchain. To cover the blockchain mining fees, there is minimum balance per coin per account: * Dogecoin 2 DOGE * NewEnglandcoin 1 NENG
Latest News Aug 30, 2020 - NENG v1.4.0.5 Released for Android/Chromebook Upgrade with armhf, better hardware support https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg55098029#msg55098029
Aug 11, 2020 - NENG v1.4.0.4 Released for Android arm64 Upgrade / Chromebook Support https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg54977437#msg54977437
Jul 30, 2020 - NENG v1.4.0.3 Released for Linux Wallet Upgrade with 8 Distros https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg54898540#msg54898540
Jul 21, 2020 - NENG v1.4.0.2 Released for MacOS Upgrade with Catalina https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg54839522#msg54839522
Jul 19, 2020 - NENG v1.4.0.1 Released for MacOS Wallet Upgrade https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg54830333#msg54830333
Jul 15, 2020 - NENG v1.4.0 Released for Android Mining, Ubuntu 20.04 support https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg54803639#msg54803639
Jul 11, 2020 - NENG v1.4.0 Android Mining, randomSpike Evaluation https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg54777222#msg54777222
Jun 27, 2020 - Pre-Announce: NENG v1.4.0 Proposal for Mobile Miner Upgrade, Android Mining Start in July 2020 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg54694233#msg54694233
Jun 19, 2020 - Best Practice for Futurebit Moonlander2 USB ASIC on solo mining mode https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg54645726#msg54645726
Mar 15, 2020 - Scrypt RandomSpike - NENG v1.3.0.1 Released for better wallet syncing https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg54030923#msg54030923
Feb 23, 2020 - Scrypt RandomSpike - NENG Core v1.3.0 Relased, Hardfork on Mar 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg53900926#msg53900926
Feb 1, 2020 - Scrypt RandomSpike Proposal Published- NENG 1.3.0 Hardfork https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg53735458#msg53735458
Jan 15, 2020 - NewEnglandcoin Dev Team Expanded with New Kickoff https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg53617358#msg53617358
Jan 12, 2020 - Explanation of Base Diff Reset and Effect of Supply https://www.reddit.com/NewEnglandCoin/comments/envmo1/explanation_of_base_diff_reset_and_effect_of/
Dec 19, 2019 - Shoreline_tradingbot version 1.0 is released https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5121953.msg53391184#msg53391184
Sept 1, 2019 - NewEnglandcoin (NENG) is Selected as Shoreline Tradingbot First Supported Coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg52331201#msg52331201
Aug 15, 2019 - Mining Update on Effect of Base Difficulty Reset, GPU vs ASIC https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg52169572#msg52169572
Jul 7, 2019 - CPU Mining on macOS Mojave is supported under latest Cheetah_Cpuminer Release https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg51745839#msg51745839
Jun 1, 2019 - NENG Fiat project is stopped by Square, Inc https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg51312291#msg51312291
Apr 21, 2019 - NENG Fiat Project is Launched by ShorelineCrypto https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg50714764#msg50714764
Apr 7, 2019 - Announcement of Fiat Project for all U.S. Residents & Mobile Miner Project Initiation https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg50506585#msg50506585
Apr 1, 2019 - Disclosure on Large Buying on NENG at ShorelineCrypto Exchange https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg50417196#msg50417196
Mar 27, 2019 - Disclosure on Large Buying on NENG at ShorelineCrypto Exchange https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg50332097#msg50332097
Mar 17, 2019 - Disclosure on Large Buying on NENG at ShorelineCrypto Exchange https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg50208194#msg50208194
Feb 26, 2019 - Community Project - NewEnglandcoin Graphic Redesign Bounty Initiated https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg49931305#msg49931305
Feb 22, 2019 - Dev Policy on Checkpoints on NewEnglandcoin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg49875242#msg49875242
Feb 20, 2019 - NewEnglandCoin v1.2.1 Released to Secure the Hard Kork https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg49831059#msg49831059
Feb 11, 2019 - NewEnglandCoin v1.2.0 Released, Anti-51% Attack, Anti-instant Mining after Hard Fork https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg49685389#msg49685389
Jan 13, 2019 - Cheetah_CpuMiner added support for CPU Mining on Mac https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg49218760#msg49218760
Jan 12, 2019 - NENG Core v1.1.2 Released to support MacOS OSX Wallet https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg49202088#msg49202088
Jan 2, 2019 - Cheetah_Cpuminer v1.1.0 is released for both Linux and Windows https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg49004345#msg49004345
Dec 31, 2018 - Technical Whitepaper is Released https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg48990334#msg48990334
Dec 28, 2018 - Cheetah_Cpuminer v1.0.0 is released for Linux https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg48935135#msg48935135
Update on Dec 14, 2018 - NENG Blockchain Stuck Issue https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg48668375#msg48668375
Nov 27, 2018 - Exclusive for PC CPU Miners - How to Steal a Block from ASIC Miners https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg48258465#msg48258465
Nov 28, 2018 - How to CPU Mine a NENG block with window/linux PC https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg48298311#msg48298311
Nov 29, 2018 - A Warning to ASIC Miners https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027091.msg48324708#msg48324708
Disclosure: Dev Team Came from ShorelineCrypto, a US based Informatics Service Business offering Fee for service for Coin Creation, Coin Exchange Listing, Blockchain Consulting, etc.
submitted by honglu69 to NewEnglandCoin [link] [comments]

Bittrex Review: One of the First Crypto Exchanges Part 1

Bittrex Review: One of the First Crypto Exchanges Part 1

By Rinat Arslanov, CEO at Revain
Despite the fact that digital asset trading is a relatively new phenomenon, among cryptocurrency exchanges Bittrex is considered a time-tested trading platform that can guarantee a high level of security and reliable service. Today, in this all-encompassing review, we will study how Bittrex Global, one of the most popular and secure crypto exchanges, operates.

Review Contents:

  • Bittrex History and Founders
  • What Bittrex Is and How It Works

1. Bittrex History and Founders

Bittrex Global is currently the oldest holding company concerned professionally with digital assets, as well as having access to major US and European financial markets. It grew out of a small cryptocurrency exchange that started with mining bitcoins for $30 back in 2011. Now the holding, whose headquarters is located in the Principality of Liechtenstein, provides a trading infrastructure to its users, enjoying a reputation of one of the safest exchanges in the world.
Bittrex Global has managed to gain such customer trust and loyalty through the continuous development and implementation of the most advanced technologies that have proven their worth by continuous and reliable operation throughout the 7 years of their existence. The company always ensures fair opportunities for investing in and trading digital assets for all clients, regardless of trading experience.
https://preview.redd.it/e6xsv33codc51.jpg?width=974&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=748c76c281116a157abb5cf03da0f4bb274170bf
https://preview.redd.it/y2csce7dodc51.jpg?width=974&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4409bf9032e0c3d5f2ca0b2b528310af8267e8ba
To this day, since January 2018, Bitcoin has not been able to rise higher than that time.
https://preview.redd.it/nqcifr3hodc51.jpg?width=974&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dfb81067c58d42dcf423b303b2e108d04c5121c9
The future Bittrex team really wanted a way to acquire Bitcoins again. Mining was going to prove untenable, so they brainstormed and started the first crypto-based business—GiftcardBTC.
At that time, Bittrex had a simple idea of earning through selling gifts and calling cards for Bitcoin. It was so easy to earn cryptocurrency and then convert it into fiat US dollars, and that endeavor made it possible to offset the costs. Then, the founders of the future cryptocurrency platform designed a Bitcoin miner that started to earn money continuously, but this was not the limit of their dreams.
Less than a year later, the first cryptocurrencies—Bitcoin and its fork Litecoin—got up in price many times and then the creators of Bittrex added Litecoin to their package. Using Coinpayments.net infrastructure for processing payments, they ran into problems, since there were still practically no abilities to convert or withdraw cryptocurrencies into fiat currencies. The founders began to look for convenient automatic ways to do this but at that time exchanges could not provide such services.
At that time, Bill Shihara and Richie Lai regularly traveled to Las Vegas and in late 2013, during one of such trips, they were discussing the problems they faced for many hours, trying to find a solution and considering various options. In the end, they decided to start software development in the west. Now this decision is considered the birthday of the Bittrex trading crypto platform.
They decided to invite a professional from Microsoft, Rami Kawach, to discuss their idea. After some time, they had an ambitious plan to develop and launch a platform for crypto exchange in less than two months. The plan was accompanied by a gentleman's dispute among Rami, Richie, and Bill over a bottle of 25-year-old whiskey, which concerned the timing of the plan.
The formed team began to work actively on a project to which they devoted all their free time and worked day and night. In mid-February 2014, they launched the Bittrex website, and on the last day of February, they made it accessible for the general public. As a result, Richie and Rami won over whiskey against Bill.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=463202.0 and started sharing on February 28 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=492758.0
https://preview.redd.it/o4aoa20rodc51.jpg?width=973&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0606a27b9da4bb5018e570dab91a7dac1fcb218c
https://preview.redd.it/5ft1k4wsodc51.jpg?width=974&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=21bf5285c1394534ed92379495f8fa76edcb1277
https://preview.redd.it/wy9fs3hvodc51.jpg?width=430&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=452ab77dca6b1a0d4a9a225c4efe7d358bf24c6c
It was then when a large partnership began; later, the alliance ensured the joint company’s future success. They formulated several postulates that became the cornerstone of their business:
  1. We ourselves will never trade cryptocurrencies on our exchange. Too many shadows occurred in too many places, and we will not trade against our clients.
  2. We will always maintain honesty on our exchange. No one gets special information. No one gets special prices. Transparency is paramount.
  3. We will never sacrifice long-term gain for short-term gain. We have been together for a long time.
https://preview.redd.it/f9yhldizodc51.jpg?width=744&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a0aef8b924395ea7bb3ba3e62ac92fd84bd6be19
Bill Shihara: https://www.linkedin.com/in/billshihara/Co-Founder, CEO at Bittrex GlobalJanuary 2014 to present
Professional Experience:
  • Amazon: 2 years 1 month. Manager, Security Engineer
  • BlackBerry: 2 years 5 months. Manager, Security Engineer
  • Microsoft: 7 years 6 months. Lead Program Manager, Security Program Manager
https://preview.redd.it/ebduvms1pdc51.jpg?width=867&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e51beea4f788618c73db69316e3bedad378b813f
Richie Lai: https://www.linkedin.com/in/richielai, https://twitter.com/richielaCo-Founder, CIO at Bittrex GlobalJanuary 2014 to present
Professional Experience:
  • Amazon: 6 years 11 months. Senior Security Engineer, Senior Security Manager
  • Microsoft: 12 years. Software Security Engineer — Principal Development Manager

https://preview.redd.it/i95qdy85pdc51.jpg?width=779&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cb15a07174c2e71df0e8f54dbd66ed9150c129b1
Rami Kawach: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rami-kawach-413a63194/, https://twitter.com/ramikawachCTO at Bittrex Global
Professional Experience:
  • Amazon: 7 years. PSA
  • Microsoft: Software Security Engineer, Principal Development Manager

Crypto Exchange Partners

Bittrex is constantly moving forward, embedding a strategy that leads the innovative future of the crypto-financial industry. To implement its strategy, the platform interacts with the most interesting innovative crypto projects based on blockchain technology. They have developed an affiliate program that helps launch trading platforms from 13 countries around the world.
Today Bittrex cooperates with the following businesses across the globe:
  • Bitmonex
  • RAIN
  • Bitvoicex
  • VCC
  • Bitsdaq/BQ.net
  • Biteeu
  • Cryptofacil
  • VALR
  • Ibitt
  • Catalx

2. What Bittrex Is and How It Works

Bittrex is a multi-currency trading platform where you can exchange, buy, or sell cryptocurrency and fiat money. The exchange is available in all facets: you have great opportunities in making foreign exchange transactions, both with digital assets and with ordinary money.
Not everyone understands what fiat currencies are, but in fact, these are the good old usual paper cash and non-cash money that are issued by the central banks of various states. Fiat money mainly differs from cryptocurrencies in that it is regulated by governments, which can influence their output and exchange rate.
On the Bittrex crypto exchange, you will find more than a quarter of thousand of various types of cryptocurrencies and 364 currency pairs. A currency pair is a pair of currencies that can be exchanged one for another at a certain rate. The most common currencies can be exchanged for hundreds and thousands of other currencies, both digital and fiat. Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin Litecoin or Ether have the largest number of pairs available for exchange.
Appearance cements the first impression, and the user interface is key in any digital. In Bittrex, the interface is intuitive even for those taking their first steps in trading. Not only does it look sleek but it’s also very easy-to-use. You only see what you need on the trading screen.
Here you can see structured information about trading pairs, history of changes in exchange rates, and wallets. The website will guide you on how to make a deposit, how to work with orders, what happens to your money, and how to withdraw it.
All work with such a platform begins with the opening of an exchange account. You can find everything you need to configure a wallet in Settings.
submitted by mPrestige to revain_org [link] [comments]

A REVIEW ABOUT GX BLOCKS PLATFORM

Cryptocurrency has gained popularity and attracted attention of investors and enthusiasts because of it's technical features and usefulness as profitable investment tool. Nonetheless, cryptocurrency is not created freely rather large number of computer based miners are able to create Bitcoin and other altcoins through use of vast energy.
In the past years, researchers have revealed that 80% energy consumption is acquired through fossil fuels and it will continue to play a crucial role in the world's development. Regardless of the advantages obtained through fossil fuels, the harmful effects outweighs the benefits against the ecosystem and mankind survival. Moreover, energy used by miners during the process of confirming cryptocurrency transactions, recording and creating new Bitcoin or cryptocurrency units is obtained from coal and thermal plants which leads to increased Co2 emissions, air pollution, rise in global warming and death rates.
Sustainability of the environment is important for continuous mankind survival and growth. Thus, some innovative start-up are researching and introducing new alternative solutions to eliminate the reliance on fossil fuels or hydrocarbons plants for supply of energy used in Bitcoins and other cryptocurrency mining operations.
GX Blocks is an example of such latest innovations that intends to apply new strategies and techniques to minimize supply of Co2 emissions and harmful contaminants into the environment, through use of renewable energy units that is clean, safe and affordable for cryptocurrency miners. https://i.ibb.co/NnbZtNb/images-11.jpg
ABOUT GX BLOCKS
Gx Blocks platform runs on blockchain and comes with a Hybrid business model that is risk free as well merged with mobile mining units connected to renewable energy mechanisms.
The platform is incredibly intuitive and user friendly with a structured DLT ecosystem to help users experience profitable mining in cryptocurrency. In GX Blocks, affordable contracts are made available for users to purchase and receive passive income from GXB profit pools. This will be distributed to GXB smart contract holders on monthly basis.
Furthermore, these contracts enables users whether professional or newcomers to easily access innovative blockchain products and excavate desired cryptocurrency which comes without expensive or hidden management charges.
Also, Multi-signature wallet is made available to allow users store their assets, make transactions and purchase cryptocurrencies without complications. The developers integrated a dashboard for users to monitor live data on Megawatts productions and Hash Rate from mining facilities. An exchange interface is merged to the platform to enable users conveniently trade their crypto assets including inter-ledger payments protocol.
Users will experience the benefits of cold staking and masternode hosting. With this, anyone can stake their funds and earn incentives even offline. Leverage of liquid cooling methods enables GX Blocks system to lower total power requirements for mining operations up to 20%, thus users will experience smooth mining operations and make more profit via optimized DC energy efficiency.
At present, the platform operates efficiently through collaboration with three prestigious suppliers namely Bitmain, 3M Science and Beeminer. Partnership with these companies makes GX Blocks to be a sustainable solution that helps to limit relying on fossil fuels or electricity for crypto mining operations as well address challenges faced by several crypto mining platforms and customers.
MORE UPDATES
Currently, GX Blocks launched a bounty campaign for anyone to participate and get rewarded for their successful task. Use this link to get started : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5257397.0 ​ Some notable reviews about the platform are shown below:
- Domain is registered from 2018-09-11 https://who.is/whois/gxblocks.com
https://i.ibb.co/hch1gmW/EKQmL72.png
- Website Alexa rank : 2,485,469 https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/gxblocks.com
[https://i.ibb.co/bmKqkYg/HykcVnn.png
- Platform 's Confidence: 77%
https://www.scamadviser.com/check-website/gxblocks.com
https://i.ibb.co/QmLVNT6/vzb9VKI.png
GX BLOCKS ROADMAP
2019 - GXB Platform and Tech Specs - Complete Company Establishment - MIT Enterprise Forum Competition 2019 - Business Management Team Established - White Paper and Business Plan Created - GX Blocks Platform Development Start - Documents Submission to Governing Body - Strategic Alliance with Dezavou Associates.
2020 - IT team hired for platform development MVP (Beta - Released in 2 months). - Construction of Liquid Data Center 250 KW - Private Pre - Sale for GX Contracts Started - Public Pre - Sale in Q3 of 2020 - Renewable Energy Sources Selection/ Investments - Autonomous Mobile Mining Solution Testing
2021 - Alpha Version of GXB Dashboard Release - Test Liquid Cooling Methods in Mobile Mining Units - First Voting to Contracts Holders - Power costs cover up to 80% from RES - First full autonomous clean energy plant - Established advisory-partnerships with industry experts in the Legal, Finance & Blockchain Industries.
For more details, use the official links below :
Website: https://gxblocks.com
WhitePaper: https : //gxblocks.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GX_Blocks_Platform_Q2_2020-1.pdf
GX Pre-Sale link : https://gxblocks.net/collections/gx-blocks-contracts
Telegram: https://t.me/gxblock
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GxBlocks
Facebook: https: // www.facebook.com/gxblocks/
Medium: https://medium.com/@gxblocks
Reddit: /useGxBlocks/
WRITER DETAILS, BTT Profile URL : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2326370;sa=summary

BTT Username : Johnson Knight
submitted by Cryptosaurus94 to ICOAnalysis [link] [comments]

The Bitcoin Conspiracy (an enthusiast's perspective)

I keep coming across comments, especially in this sub, from people claiming that Bitcoin was created by the CIA or some government agency as part of the plan for the NWO and cashless society. I want to share my experience and try to clear up the confusion surrounding this topic.
I first got involved with Bitcoin in late 2016 when I heard about it and got some while at a libertarian festival. Back then it was still very popular among the agorist community and was being promoted as THE silver bullet that was going to disrupt the global fiat banking system.
Putting preconceptions aside, a new user might ask, "what's so special about Bitcoin? We already have digital currencies."
Well, you only need to read the first page of the whitepaper to discover what the original intent of Bitcoin was. It most definitely was not intended to be a tool for central banks to subjugate the world to a centralized global currency. Quite the opposite in fact. Read the full whitepaper here.
When I first learned about Bitcoin, it forced me to learn about economics, then the Federal Reserve, then one by one the dominoes fell and down the conspiracy rabbit hole I went. In 2017 (actually it started a few years earlier, but I wasn't paying attention back then) there was a very heated debate in the Bitcoin community regarding scaling.
I'll try to break it down simply:
In the very early days, when Bitcoin was just a project being worked on by a few very technical people, no one knew about it. All it took was a handful of people running the software on their laptops to mine new coins. Since there was not much computing power on the network, it meant there could easily be a spam attack where a malicious user could join the network and generate many gigabytes of spam transactions that would overload and crash the network. To prevent this, Satoshi implemented a limit of 1MB per block, to protect the network until there was enough computing power to be able to handle larger blocks.
This measure worked, and Bitcoin grew exponentially.
Satoshi vanished in 2010, after WikiLeaks attracted unwanted attention to the project by accepting Bitcoin donations. He left clear instructions for his successors that the 1MB block size limit was meant to be increased once the network could support high levels of user traffic. At the time, there still was not much use, so it wasn't until around 2014 that blocks started hitting the 1MB cap and all of a sudden users had to compete (by paying higher transaction fees) in order to get their transaction mined into the next block.
Up until then, sending a Bitcoin transaction would cost $0.0001 (hundredth of a penny) or less, no matter if you were sending $0.10 or $1,000,000. Now, since block space was limited, fees started to rise, as miners would only include the transactions with the highest fees. Over the next couple years, transaction fees went up dramatically, at times reaching as high as $100 to send a single transaction.
The solution was obvious - raise the block size limit.
But this led to a heated debate, and this is where the conspiracy became obvious to those who were paying attention. Since Bitcoin was decentralized and open source, anyone could contribute, but certain people controlled the commit access to the github repo, and it became apparent that those individuals had been compromised, as any and all mention of increasing the block size was met with fierce resistance.
There was a misinformation campaign to discredit anyone arguing for larger blocks. The argument was that larger blocks would mean users could not run the software on their low-power personal devices and laptops; that by increasing the block size it would lead to mining centralization. Well, if you read the whitepaper linked above, you'll see that Satoshi predicted this. He knew mining would eventually be left to "specialized server farms" while normal users could use what he termed Simplified Payment Verification (SPV) wallets.
But this point was consistently shot down in the community, and especially on /bitcoin. There was a MASSIVE censorship campaign in the bitcoin subreddit that continues to this day where anyone who questions the official narrative or even asks a basic technical question is immediately banned. /bitcoin today is nothing but a cesspit of price memes and misinformation. Go to /btc for the uncensored discussions (but beware of trolls).
In 2017 the debate was finally settled, sort of. Now known as "Bitcoin Core" (the name of the official Bitcoin software), the developers implemented a change known as SegWit (Segregated Witness) which fundamentally altered the way the software validates transactions. It was implemented as a "soft fork" rather than a "hard fork".
I'll explain the difference.
In a fork, the network comes to a consensus on new rules that all participants must follow. In a hard fork, the changes are non-backwards compatible, so all users must update their software or else be left behind on a dead network. Hard forks happen all the time in software development, but in the case of SegWit, the developers refused to make any non-backwards compatible changes for fear it might alienate users. Again, another unfounded fear. "We can't ever upgrade the technical capabilities of the network (such as the block size) because some people might not go along with it."
All kinds of mental gymnastics were performed to justify their refusal to increase the block size, and there was nothing anyone could do about it except fork as an independent project. The 1MB block limit is now essentially set in stone for BTC. So in August 2017, Bitcoin Cash (BCH) hard forked by increasing the block size limit to 8MB, along with some other changes.
Fast forward to December 2017 and Bitcoin was at its all time high of nearly $20,000. But fees were also astronomical and because of the 1MB block size limit, a huge backlog formed, and some people had to wait days or even weeks for their transaction to confirm. If anyone was trying to cash out into fiat and didn't want to pay a $100 transaction fee, by the time their transaction got confirmed the price had already crashed.
This event was largely responsible for the bear market of 2018. Everything that happened was predicted by those who knew what was going on.
A company called Blockstream had essentially wrestled control of Bitcoin from the original developers and shut them out or gained control over them, and started working on turning Bitcoin into a settlement layer for their product called Lightning Network.
LN is a complicated topic that I don't want to get into, but essentially it's a framework that recreates all the same problems inherent in the banking system that Bitcoin was meant to solve. Blockstream's goal is to profit from creating, and then "solving" those problems by charging users fees for all kinds of custodial services.
In my personal opinion, it's obvious that the original Bitcoin project has been hijacked and repurposed into a tool for the central banks. The propaganda is being pushed in some conspiracy circles that Bitcoin was created BY the central banks in order to discourage people from researching the true history. What is now commonly called "Bitcoin" is not the original project, but a Trojan horse.
The project that most closely follows the original design is Bitcoin Cash, and that is where almost all organic development is happening, and personally I feel that it's picking up steam lately as more people wake up to what's happening in the economy right now. Unfortunately most people are still unaware of how fundamentally broken BTC is now and so as new users run toward cryptocurrency to escape the dollar collapse, most will fall straight into the trap and be stuck with BTC that they won't be able to use without paying exorbitant fees and/or submitting to the very same tracking system they are trying to get away from.
This is a very deep rabbit hole but I think I've written enough for now. I hope this info helps people make sense of what's going on with Bitcoin. I know it's confusing enough even without so much deception taking place so hopefully this helps.
Read the Bitcoin FAQ over on /btc.
submitted by PM_ME_YOUR_ALTCOINS to conspiracy [link] [comments]

Foreman: manage your ASICs and FPGAs remotely!

Hello Reddit!
I'd like to welcome you all to try Foreman, our miner management platform.
Site: https://foreman.mn/
Demo: here
What we offer:
What we support: (user request driven - you ask, we add support)
ASICs and FPGAs:
Rigs:
If you're still with us, check us out. Fully free for 30 days!
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to hop on our Discord.
BitcoinTalk: here
Medium: here
Twitter: here
Open-source: here
Happy Mining,
The Foreman Team
submitted by lambrosif to BitcoinMining [link] [comments]

Network effect doesn't explain Bitcoin dominance : technical arguments for Bitcoin Maximalism

I often saw some Bitcoiners counter the altcoin shillers with the following argument: "Bitcoin is the first so it has the network effect, so your altcoin will always worth less"
This is not totally wrong but I think this argument is bad. Using it implies implicitly that you admit that Bitcoin is technically less capable than altcoins with their higher transaction rate, fast blocks, instant confirmation, without fees and smart contract support....

And this is WRONG ! Bitcoin price is higher, because Bitcoin is already TECHNICALLY BETTER than any other altcoin and not because of network effect. In 2017, Bitcoin dominance was lower, some altcoin reaches almost the same level than Bitcoin. So network effect is not what prevents an altcoin to take the lead but it is the fact that almost all altcoin that pretend to be better than Bitcoin are technically flawed.
Why ? They use bigger blocks, DAGs (Directed Acyclic Graphs, like used in IOTA or Nano) or wtf they created to disturbe you and make you believe they are better than the good old Bitcoin blockchain. But they have at least one of these two weak points: validation time oand bandwidth.

If they use biggefaster blocks, validation time of block is higher and so block propagation is slower. Less nodes can operate as they may not be able to validate blocks fast enough to keep up with the tip of the chain. You end up like Ethereum that has less and less full verification nodes leading to centralization of the network.
If they use DAGs, they achieve consensus through a "proof-of-stake" vote and always at the cost of bandwidth (quadratic cost in number of node, linear in transaction rate). DAGs are often presented as "each node has its own ledger" but the reality is that the only global ledger you should trust is the complete DAG of the ledgers of each node. Only servers with a shitload of download bandwidth can maintain it as debunked here and here. To not look (in fact be) centralized, some DAG altcoins doesn't, opening the door to history rewrite by buying account that owned a big stake before and still use a lot of bandwidth to reach consensus. Bitcoin just add 80 bytes of proof-of-work data on a block of 1-2MB to achieve it and protect from history rewrite, almost zero cost for the network (that's why we pay fees to miners who carry the cost).
You only have those problems when it reaches a critical level of usage and only then we can see how much those limits where ignored. Until now, very few altcoins reached the limit (maybe Ethereum, and IOTA shows us it is centralized already by stopping the network)
Bitcoin has the highest price because Bitcoin is technically the only possible decentralized king (and a centralized cryptocurrency worths nothing). Yes maybe 1MB limit was too conservativ, yes fees are higher, yes 10 minutes is slow. But if everyone wants their coffee payment to be settled onchain, 1MB or 8MB or 32MB each 10 minutes, minutes or secondes will never be enough while it is a big difference for the network health. You only need the blockchain for settlement, for payment you have Lightning Network that can already destroy PayPal's transaction rate.
So next time you feel convinced by an altcoin that pretend to be better than Bitcoin while being decentralized by design, evaluate the requirement to be a fully validating node and what the overhead of bandwidth needed to achieve consensus. The chances are high that they didn't take care of one of these two issues and end up centralized or broken. You don't need the network effect argument.
submitted by Pantamis to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

08-03 21:55 - 'Using my porn account because I'll probably get banned from r/Bitcoin for daring to dissent but you're wrong about this. / In the ORIGINAL [Bitcointalk.com thread] that discusses UASF, the OG poster shaolinfry himsel...' by /u/AbnormalSpermMaybe removed from /r/Bitcoin within 89-99min

'''
Using my porn account because I'll probably get banned from Bitcoin for daring to dissent but you're wrong about this.
In the ORIGINAL [Bitcointalk.com thread]1 that discusses UASF, the OG poster shaolinfry himself says: ""So-called "censorship" soft forks do not require nodes to opt in, because >51% of the hash power already have the ability to orphan blocks that contain transactions they have blacklisted. Since this is not a change in validity, nodes will accept the censored block chain automatically.""
Miners can't change the bitcoin blockchain without node consent, but they sure can censor it. And that's what the meme says.
'''
Context Link
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: AbnormalSpermMaybe
1: *it**in**l*.or*/*ndex.php?topic=180*060.*
Unknown links are censored to prevent spreading illicit content.
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Gold AMD Miner Released - lolMiner .5 144_5 AMD ... Bitcoin Mining bitcoin mining 2019 should we mine bitcoin? get answer now Let's Try Claymore v14.7 with RXBOOST! - YouTube Earning Bitcoin From Posting On BITCOINTALK Forums! Inside a Bitcoin mine that earns $70K a day - YouTube

Bitcoin Miner Virus - How to Detect and Remove It Bitcoin Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for Bitcoin crypto-currency enthusiasts. Is there a Bitcoin miner that I can run using the command line on Windows? I want a CPU miner, not.. Popular Alternatives to Bitcoin Miner for Web, Windows, Linux, Mac, Android and more. Explore 25+ apps like Bitcoin Miner, all suggested and ranked by ... The miner reports GPU hash rates every 30 seconds. These are the full GPU hash rates before dev fee deduction (your pool hashrate will be slightly lower). The miner includes a read-only api based on the sgminer-5.5 API. Both the json and text formats are supported. For more details, we refer to the sgminer api documentation. Pay Tribute to Cryptocurrency Pioneers Bitcoin and Burst! Change the way of cryptocurrency production A Better Crypto Currency System ... BHD can realize the original intention of Satoshi Nakamoto ---- everyone can become a miner. Lowered the cost of credit, increased the strength and breadth of consensus, and improved the security of the consensus architecture BHD feature. Energy saving and ... Bminer: When Crypto-mining Made Fast¶. Bminer is a highly optimized cryptocurrency miner that runs on modern AMD / NVIDIA GPUs. Bminer is one of the fastest publicly available miners today -- we use various techniques including tiling and pipelining to realize the full potentials of the hardware.. Bminer also comes with REST APIs to facilitate production deployments (e.g., mining farms). Who is online. In total there are 14 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 13 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes) Most users ever online was 851 on Thu Apr 16, 2020 12:01 am Legend: Administrators, Global moderators

[index] [49902] [7761] [46959] [694] [12209] [28347] [40669] [42818] [41442] [35105]

Bitcoin Gold AMD Miner Released - lolMiner .5 144_5 AMD ...

Download BitcoinZ GUI Miner: https://mega.nz/#!Anpyja7J!ZgGJ9Hv-pKksxz1ui1q41gU6mQ79dHYbNbV56hQjnzw BitcoinZ GUI Miner Developed by: AIOMiner Team (https://a... Claymore Ethereum 14.7 Download Miner - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1433925.0 Buy an Asus RX 480 8GB Strix? - https://geni.us/2UUbiW Or an RX 580... BitcoinTalk.org is the main Bitcoin discussion forum for tech support, mining, development, and economics. BitcoinTalk helped bring bitcoin to life by connec... The virtual goldrush to mine Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies leads us to Central Washington state where a Bitcoin mine generates roughly $70,000 a day min... Bitcoin Gold AMD Miner Released - lolMiner .5 144_5 AMD Miner There is a finally a stable version of a Bitcoin gold amd miner! Previously, lolminer was being...

#